They often suffer from enormous pain and have to rely on nurses and family members to eat, dress, bath, etc. This condition can be very degrading for a person, and euthanasia helps avoid this helpless and desperate situation. Second, euthanasia gives people a freedom of choice in situations when they can control neither their health nor their life in general.
Third, terminally ill patients require considerable financial and human resources that could be used to treat other patients. By choosing to die peacefully, they allow healthcare providers to use these resources more effectively.
At the same time, one cannot deny the fact that euthanasia is a controversial practice from moral, ethical, and religious perspectives. Opponents claim that people do not have rights to take their own lives because it is unnatural and contradicts the law of God. It also devalues human life and can lead to the dangerous corruption. Healthcare providers can use euthanasia to kill people without their permission to save resources, which is a serious crime. Besides, physicians have sworn to protect and value human life, so they should not be allowed to participate in assisted suicides Morrison, As far as I am concerned, euthanasia in itself is not a bad thing.
People should have a right to choose how to die and should not be forced to suffer immense pain and misery. Our primary responsibility is to ensure that euthanasia is performed without breaking the laws and a medical code of ethics. How to achieve this is another question that requires a separate discussion.
Pros and cons of euthanasia. Revista Romana de Bioetica, 13 3. However, I would like to support euthanasia and, with the help of this paper, to argue in favor of it. It is necessary to note that there are several types of euthanasia.
Passive euthanasia is already widespread in hospitals and is nothing but the impossibility to cure a person and attempts to alleviate the sufferings with the help of narcotics or the cessation of therapy because of its futility.
While passive euthanasia is legally used in hospitals, the application of non-aggressive euthanasia is constantly debated. In the case when the euthanasia may be voluntary, I would like to highlight the human right to be in charge of their life.
Sick bedridden people are already bereft of all rights; they feel a burden for their relatives. Humble and disabled, they want at least to leave this world peacefully and to die with dignity. Even criminals have a right for their last wish; frankly speaking, it is our duty to fulfill the last wish of sick patients. So, thus we incite them to a great sin and crime.
Besides, a man is created for life, and all of us have the instinct of self-preservation, only people driven to despair by their disease, can ask for death and it is their right. It is necessary to realize how horrible it is to live, being conscious of the forthcoming death. Most people cannot overcome this pressure and lose the sense of life, burdening their own life and the life of their relatives as well.
In cases of inability of patients to express their will, euthanasia is also possible and is justified. Then the decision should be taken by the relatives, who are responsible for that.
Often it is obvious that the patient is doomed to death and has no chances to survive. Still, relatives have to provide all necessary medicines and to pay for places in hospital. Many families spend their last money on the treatment that is vain. Another possible reason for the justifying of euthanasia is the lack of space in hospitals for those who can be cured and saved.
It is bitter to acknowledge it, but this problem exists in many countries. Those who want to live have no chance to get the proper treatment and care while those who want to die cannot give their place to them.
In fact, I suppose the greatest problem of this controversial point is the inability of the government to implement a thoroughly made law that can foresee all the possible problems of the legalization of euthanasia and avoid them. To make a conclusion, I am sure that euthanasia has the right to exist in our society. It should be considered not as a murder but as an absolute necessity in urgent situations. Euthanasia and the Right to Die.
Euthanasia: The Pros and Cons Essay - Euthanasia: The pros Anatomy Durkos Sarah Carter Jan 6, Over the years there has been a debate on whether euthanasia is a “humane” form of death. Some believe it isn't humane and others believe euthanasia is personal choice.
This essay has been submitted by a law student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers. An Analysis of Euthanasia its Pros and Cons.
Free sample essay on why euthanasia should be legalised. Get help with writing an essay on euthanasia topic. Pro euthanasia arguments essay example. Research paper on legalizing euthanasia. Free Essay: Euthanasia, good or bad? In this following article I will be exploring euthanasia in more detail, the different Christian points of view, the.
Euthanasia: pros and cons essays Euthanasia, what is it exactly. Euthanasia is the extreme doctors could go and the extent that some do to relive the pains of their patience, assisted suicide. Is it killing or is it relief, is it right or is it wrong, and if so morally, lawfully, or both. Scienti. Euthanasia pros essay - Get started with essay writing and make finest essay ever All sorts of academic writings & custom papers. Perfectly written and HQ academic essays.