This stage stresses shared benefits and shared costs of the topic, and it prepares the reader to consider the arguments with a calm and open frame of mind. Outline the third stage. In the third stage, state your own position very briefly -- enough to provide the reader with an understanding of your beliefs in relation to his or her own -- but then to proceed to examine what you understand to be the beliefs of those who do not share your stance.
This stage is crucial: The examination of the beliefs of your opponent must be respectful, honest, reasonably complete and in proportion to the length of the essay as a whole, and there should be no sense of setting the opposition up to lose or to be ridiculed.
A sense of honest empathy is desired, without any sense of falseness or patronization. If this stage of the essay fails, the essay as a whole fails. Readers in opposition will have no reason to continue in trust and with open minds if you have not first demonstrated good faith, intellectual honesty and respect. This is not the same as submission; you may and should remain true to your own position.
But you must be capable of understanding and giving a fair representation of an opposing position. Outline the fourth stage. Here you restate your own position and examine it more fully in relation to the opposing position. This stage must give honest recognition of the other party's strong arguments and must also address those elements the two positions have in common.
When a reasonable compare and contrast has been done, conceding weaknesses on your side and finding mutual areas of shared interest, you are ready for the final stages of the essay.
Present a possible starting point for discussion, based on shared goals and interests, with a clear statement of areas left to be explored and discussed. This is the point at which you reach the goal of the essay: To achieve this stage successfully, the reader should have at all stages a sense of honesty, honor and open-mindedness on your part, as well as a belief that there was a good-faith attempt at understanding the position of others. The conclusion is not an argument intended to win a conflict but to win trust and an open exchange of ideas.
It should reprise the nature of the subject, give another brief and respectful review of both sides, as well as offer a slightly longer review of shared positions and the benefit of open, good-faith dialogue. It should end on a positive note of hope. Test the connections between the stages and the flow of the discussion, and give special attention to fair evaluation and generous good will toward the opposing side.
Remember, in a Rogerian essay, you can't "win" by beating your opponent, but only by convincing your opponent to work with you with an open mind, in shared respect. Write the actual essay working from your staged notes. When you complete the essay, prepare second and third drafts to double- and triple-check your treatment of the opposing side and the nature of shared positions and mutual benefits.
The tone of the writing must avoid patronization, disrespect or an assumption of foreknowledge that the opponent will eventually accept your stance in full. The emotional burden of the writing need not be neutral -- and would often be seen as dishonest if it were neutral -- but it must be well-informed, fair-minded and obviously written in a good-faith attempt to understand and consider an "alien" point of view.
The same can be said for Libya and currently in DR. However, the same cannot be said for countries such Rwanda or Bosnia where modern genocide occurred under the watch of the international committee. Despite all the daily reports and evidence coming from Syria, the international community is still undecided on which course of action to take to alleviate the pain and suffering of the innocent civilians. Statement of Validity Context or specific circumstance s in which this view may be considered valid: Statement of Benefit s Even though it is right that domestic conflicts are best solved nationally, it is in the interest of the innocent and oppressed that the international committee intervenes to enforce these solutions.
The international committee should intervene in escalating domestic conflicts to help in resolving. Relate to how SL. Spent yrs negotiating till intervention. Home Argument Rogerian Argument Outline. This is just a sample. To get a unique essay Hire Writer. A limited time offer! Get custom essay sample written according to your requirements Urgent 3h delivery guaranteed Order Now. How to Write a Critical Analysis.
Follow this outline and example to form a Rogerian argument essay. Rogerian arguments are named for the psychologist who developed the technique, Carl Rogers. Rogers' research on human socialization suggested that traditional debate format, Aristotelian, was doomed to cause more conflict than it solved. With Roger's format, you can persuade an audience without agreeing to terms you cannot meet.
Rogerian Argument b2bproxy.cf writing your outline for your Rogerian argument essay, you first have to familiarize yourself with the pros and cons or the two possible sides of your b2bproxy.cf is, get to know which side of the argument you are for and which side of the argument may be against your position.
The Rogerian essay is named for the type of argument it makes–the Rogerian argument named after psychologist Carl Rogers. He believed that the key to effective communication lies in each side’s ability to negotiate differences in order to better understand each other. How to Write a Rogerian Essay: Quick Tips to Keep in Mind. Don’t Be. A Rogerian essay is meant to help students understand issues from two different perspectives to come up with an agreeable solution. According to Carl Roger's effort in. How To Write A Rogerian Essay. March 31, by admin Basic Essay Writing Tips. Rogerian argument is more of a negotiation method whereby shared goals are identified.
A successful Rogerian argument essay structure spends time discussing opposing positions. This is what sets the Rogerian essay apart from other types of papers. Writing such an essay requires being able to see both sides of an issue while still asserting a specific viewpoint regarding your subject matter. Rogerian Method of Argumentation Use this outline if you are looking at two sides of an issue and want to reach a compromise with the point of view that is opposite yours.